
I visited my foreign friend’s house once and had dinner with his family. Me, a 20-year old foreign girl from who went to America with two suitcases, a heavy accent and a heavy heart for not doing enough to make my country a better place. They, the high-class, well-educated and cultured European family I have always wished to have, with a refined taste for literature, art, fashion and music. The kind of people that wear evening shoes while they dine in their own house. We were all sitting around the dinner-table, talking about all the wonderful opportunities globalization has brought about and how the world is such a borderless place. Free movement of capital, goods, services and people. After all, I could have gone anywhere with my two suitcases and my heavy heart. America, Canada, Austalia, France, China, even Nigeria accepts foreign scholarship students. But then, a long-time family friend of his father’s, an admirable genius with a vast knowledge of pretty much everything under the sun, started telling me his side of the story.
“All these Indians, that come into this country, they are everywhere. In the park, in the shop, in the streets. There is no place left to breath where they are not.”
The whole family joined in the discussion.
“And they are eating on the social insurance plans. Eating on the benefits.”
“If you treat migrants well, give them the kind of human rights Europeans demand for themselves and you only encourage them to keep coming.”
“Why wouldn't they keep coming to the Country where after one year they get free schooling?”
“All they want are the benefits.”
I was a foreigner to them, in their house for the first time. I consider myself independent and I have been self-sufficient ever since I left home and yet, I could not help feeling abased. Feeling the sin of all the people that have ever emigrated anywhere. Now, that’s what I consider a very welcoming first meeting. A good chance to get to know each other.
“I am telling you, I wish there were more green spaces than Indians in this country. The Indians are occupying all our green spaces.”
The sister, who is a wonderful witty creature, seemed to be the only one seeing my point. “And you think that is the Indians’ fault?’
“There are no more green spaces anywhere.”
I felt I was Faust in a conversation with Mephistopheles: “This is Hell and you’re in it”. I realized globalization has made a hell of the living earth - it has restructured and demolished the concept of a united and peaceful society. Instead of creating unity it has produced even more differences enhancing borders, and instead of ending conflict it has brought the disintegration and the militarization of the world.
Globalization has not helped to create a borderless world. Rather, globalization has led both to a proliferation of borders and their diffusion throughout society, at the market, city, nation-state and mondial level, leading to a tension between the need to remove borders as barriers to trade and mobility and the need to reinstall borders in the face of perceived security threats from terrorists, drug traffickers, illegal immigrants and most importantly, the different Other. The border reconstruction has been in such a way as to keep borders open for capital, cheap labor and free movement of the wealthy, and to close the border for those who might make citizenship demands or rights claims on the declining welfare state.
Globalization, and especially globalization through technology, does not produce uniformity, but gradations and variations in the social composition of society. By giving people the possibility to move from one place to the other, globalization tries to give disadvantaged people a chance to get to the level of the rich, but instead of creating opportunities for all, what it ends up achieving is the transfer of cheap labor to developed Western countries, the free movement of the wealthy, and the creation of invisible borders for those who are too different and are seen as too dangerous at the level of the city and even at the level of the nation-state as they might start making citizenship demands or claims on the declining welfare state.
Many poor countries are short of nationals with appropriate skills who have taken their talent and competences to other parts of the world. Globalization and the ease of travel and of finding work in a foreign place have provided rich countries with skilled labour and have contributed to a brain drain from underdeveloped to developed regions. But, taking all this as an opportunity and a chance for the integration of the poor would be a very superficial way of thinking about globalization. What this is in fact is a sort of warlordism and enslaving, where the poor live with the rich cheek-by-jowl, emphasizing the visible contrast of wealth and poverty, notably in capital citites where expensive housing estates coexit with bidonvilles and where strangers and outsiders are feared.
The rich Westerner feels endangered by the cultural tipping. What is more, is that the dominant community begins to feel itself alienated from its own patrimony by outsiders. This smart academic, who has published papers and books and has traveled the world, feels that his green spaces are taken away from him by some poor Indian!! This is a fear that encourages extremism and the rise of groups of angry people on both sides, angry rich people who want to feel protected and use violence in the form of militarization of cities and insulating themselves from the outside Other, and angry poor people who demand the same rights as the rich, who can only use violence in the form of riots and protests to make themselves heard and communicate their demands which would not be heard otherwise.












